Legal Opinion

Hart v. Taber

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1911No. L.A. No. 2695PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The sheriff of Los Angeles County, one of the respondents herein, sought to sell under execution the interest of Irene May Hart in certain real property following a judgment obtained on a promissory note executed by said Hart in favor of Taber. Plaintiff claiming a homestead interest in the property as the widow of John Curry obtained a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from selling it, but after a trial of the action the superior court dissolved the injunction, found that Taber’s judgment against plaintiff was a lien on the premises,' and adjudged the levy of execution valid.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Blair v. HazzardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Tooley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API