Legal Opinion

Williams v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1915No. S.F. No. 6751PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiffs are the children of defendant 'John Z. Williams. They pleaded that their mother, the wife of defendant John Z. Williams, died, leaving separate property in the county of Fresno; that by her will she devised the fee of this property to them, subject to a life estate in her husband; that their father was named as executor of this will and caused the will to be probated and administration under the will to be had upon the estate of their mother; that the decree of distribution in the matter of the estate was duly and' regularly made and given and has become final; that by this decree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Howard v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Tooley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Tassi v. TassiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kilmartin v. NasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API