Legal Opinion

Tooley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1941No. 9743PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Homer H. Tooley, as executor of the will of Came M. Botts, who had been the widow of J. M. Botts, seeks review of a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals holding that her estate is the transferee, under section 311 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 311, of certain assets of the estate of J. M. Botts, and liable as such transferee for the federal tax of Mr. Botts’ income for the calendar year 1933. No question is raised concerning the amount of the tax, the sole question being whether Mrs. Botts and her estate are transferees within .the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Mysse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Henry Hess Co. Henry Hess Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Eversole v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API