Ions v. Harbison
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. George Puterbaugh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Action to quiet title. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals therefrom, and *265from an order denying a new trial. The property in question is the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 35, township 14 south, of range 3 west, San Bernardino meridian, containing forty acres, situated iíx San Diego county.
On February 10, 1888, Charles U. Bell, being the owner of said premises, conveyed them to his wife, Mary E. Bell, by a grant deed duly executed, for the consideration of eight hundred and fifty dollars. On October 12, 1888, Bell and wife executed to one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Goodman v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.