In Re the Estate of Fath
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County denying a petition for distribution. S. P. Hall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison,j.
—Appeal from an order denying a petition for distribution.
December 29, 1865, Adam Path was the owner of certain real property in Alameda County, and on that day he filed in the office of the county recorder a declaration, properly executed and acknowledged by him, of his intention to claim and use the same as a homestead. The property so claimed was Ms separate estate, and of less than five thousand dollars in value, and he and Mary Path, the above-named decedent, were husband and wife, and resided thereon with their family. A portion of the land covered by the declaration was conveyed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Keyes v. CyrusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Thorsby v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.