Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Klumpke

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1914No. S.F. Nos. 6642 and 6650PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting apart a probate homestead. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Over ten years after the death of deceased and the admission of her last will to probate, her surviving husband, John G. Klumpke, the executor of her will, filed his petition in the matter of her estate asking that certain property inventoried as a part of her estate, the same being a fifty vara lot valued at thirty-two thousand five hundred dollars, be selected and set apart to him as a homestead. The application was opposed by certain devisees and legatees of deceased. The court made an order setting apart as a homestead the whole of said property in fee simple absolute to the petitioner.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API