Legal Opinion

Salvaty v. Falcon Cable Television

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1985No. B005534PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

The issue in this case is whether a telephone company and cable television company had to secure a private property owner’s consent before cable television equipment was installed on a telephone pole situated on the telephone company’s easement on the property. We find that no such consent was required as the cable equipment was within the scope of the easement which the telephone company apportioned to the cable company.

Benjamin B. Salvaty and Marion R. Salvaty are appealing the dismissal of their second amended complaint after the trial court sustained without leave to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hoffman v. Capitol Cablevision System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Jolliff v. Hardin Cable Television Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. City of Los Angeles v. IgnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Align Technology, Inc. v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Cousins v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API