Legal Opinion

Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. Cook

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1991No. 89-2011PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case presents the question of whether an easement granted to a utility company may be apportioned and partially assigned to a cable television company in a situation where the grantors were silent regarding their intent to allow apportionment of the easement and where the grantors made no express reservation regarding apportionment. We answer this question in the affirmative. Thus, we must reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on this issue. This case also asks us to interpret a contract between the utility company and the cable company allegedly assigning an interest in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Salvaty v. Falcon Cable TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Crowley v. New York Telephone Co.Nassau County District Court · 1975

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Heydon v. Mediaone of Southeast Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Chijian Zhang v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State ex rel. New Wen, Inc. v. Marchbanks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API