Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This case presents the question of whether an easement granted to a utility company may be apportioned and partially assigned to a cable television company in a situation where the grantors were silent regarding their intent to allow apportionment of the easement and where the grantors made no express reservation regarding apportionment. We answer this question in the affirmative. Thus, we must reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on this issue. This case also asks us to interpret a contract between the utility company and the cable company allegedly assigning an interest in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Salvaty v. Falcon Cable TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Crowley v. New York Telephone Co.Nassau County District Court · 1975
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Heydon v. Mediaone of Southeast Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Chijian Zhang v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State ex rel. New Wen, Inc. v. Marchbanks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.