Faus v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
The issue in this case devolves from the fact that in 1955 public motor coach service was substituted for public electric railway service over rights of way in the Los Angeles area that were granted for an electric railway. Plaintiff urges that the conversion of the rights of way conflicts with the terms of the instruments of their creation, causing a destruction of the easements to which the parcels were subject. For the reasons set forth in this opinion we have concluded that the present use of the subject parcels sufficiently complies with the purposes of the grantors to permit survival of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Montgomery v. Santa Ana Westminster Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Menno Toews, Evelyn Toews, and Norman Meachum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.