Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Capitol Cablevision System, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1976PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.
The plaintiffs are owners in fee of real property in Latham, New. York. In 1954 their predecessors in title granted to the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and to the New York Telephone Company "their respective successors and assigns, the right, privilege and authority to construct, maintain, operate, repair and replace lines, consisting of poles, conduits, guys, guy stubs, crossarms, wires and appurtenances for the distribution of electricity and messages upon, under, along or across the property which we own”. On June 17,1971 and November 1, 1971 Niagara Mohawk and New York Telephone,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Antonopulos v. Postal Telegraph Cable CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Banach v. Home Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Hoffman v. Capitol Cablevision Systems, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Crowley v. New York Telephone Co.Nassau County District Court · 1975
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Heydon v. Mediaone of Southeast Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.