Legal Opinion

Jolliff v. Hardin Cable Television Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1971No. Nos. 70-351 and 70-357PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

The determinative issue raised in these appeals is whether, under the easements granted to Ohio Power by plaintiffs’ predecessors in title, Ohio Power can apportion its rights thereunder and permit Hardin Cable, as sub-lessee, to make use of the easements for the purpose of attaching its coaxial cable.

On that issue, the Court of Appeals expressed the view that the easements in question did not convey to Ohio Power “an exclusive right to use the servient tenement for electric or other power right of way purposes” and that “for Ohio Power to apportion its rights” would constitute “competition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinman v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Central Trust Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cellco Partnership v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. LRC Realty, Inc. v. B.E.B. Properties (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Henley v. CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API