Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Igna
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1962No. Civ. 26014PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The question on appeal concerns the extent of the burden on the servient tenement of an easement, presently existing in behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, City of Los Angeles, and the Department of Water and Power thereof, both of whom hereinafter are referred to jointly as the “city.” There is no controversy as to the existence of the easement in favor of the present plaintiffs. The easement in question was acquired in 1936 for the purpose of bringing into Los Angeles the power to be generated at Hoover Dam, then under construction.
The source of respondent’s title to the subject right of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- McCormick v. Great Western Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Collins v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Kesterson v. California-Oregon Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Salvaty v. Falcon Cable TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Holson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Mehdizadeh v. MincerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- City of Los Angeles v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.