First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered after a determination of pri*16ority. The plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly upheld the validity of the defendant’s2 mechanic’s lien (1) despite the fact that the recorded certificate contained no description of the property other than naming the town in which the property is located, and (2) despite the defendant’s failure to record and serve a notice of lis pendens, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-325, within one year of the date of the lien as contemplated by General Statutes § 49-39. The plaintiff also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. BorsukSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Harkins v. Girouard Estates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Butch v. Mangomutha, No. Cv-90-0375968s (Apr. 28, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993