Legal Opinion

Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is the lienability of a contractor’s work in road building and site preparation under the mechanic’s lien act before its 1974 amendment. The plaintiff, Pasquale Camputaro, also known as Pat Camputaro, doing business as Roma Construction Company, sued to recover for services rendered and materials furnished pursuant to an agreement with the corporate defendant, the Stuart Hardwood Corporation (formerly the Stuart Paley Co., Inc.). One count of the complaint sought damages under a bond given in substitution for a mechanic’s lien by the corporate defendant as…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Enfield Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. BissellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API