Legal Opinion
H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1981PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.
In this appeal the parties are contesting the notice required by General Statutes §§ 49-34 1 and 49-35 2 to be served upon the property owner in order to validate a mechanic’s lien.
The plaintiff, H & S Torrington Associates (hereinafter H & S), is a general partnership engaged in the construction of shopping centers. Desiring to build the Torrington North Shopping Center upon land it owned in Torrington, H & S entered into a contract with Healy Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter Healy Construction), a Massachusetts corporation, as general contractor. Bernard H. Healy, Jr., was one of two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Roundhouse Construction Corp. v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Henry F. Raab Connecticut, Inc. v. J. W. Fisher Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pero Building Co. v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- General Electric Supply Co. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.