Legal Opinion
Stone v. Rosenfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1954PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff on property owned by the defendants Joseph A. Rosenfield and Richard Weinfield, hereinafter referred to as the defendants. The trial court found that the lien was void. From its judgment an appeal was taken.
The finding is not subject to correction. The facts may be summarized as follows: The property is located on Wethersfield Avenue in Hartford. It includes a two-family dwelling house and, in the rear, a brick building formerly used as an ice plant. On June 6,1950, the defendants and Holland Cleansers, Inc.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capen v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- City of Hartford v. Town of SuffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Rose v. Persse & Brooks Paper WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Stockwell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.