Legal Opinion
Harkins v. Girouard Estates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 1993No. 11260PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
This appeal arises out of an action in which the plaintiff sought to foreclose a mortgage he held on five subdivision lots. The named defendant and the defendant James R. DeVito were defaulted for failure to disclose a defense. Darien Asphalt Paving, Inc., and Darien Asphalt Paving, Inc., doing business as F.G.B. Paving and Excavating Company (hereafter referred to as Darien) were permitted to intervene as defendants by virtue of their allegation that a mechanic’s lien they held on the rights of access to the five lots had priority over the plaintiff’s mortgage.
Darien now appeals from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Nickel Mine Brook Associates v. SakalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. GarofaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. G. L. D. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Faught v. Edgewood Corners, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hyde Road Development, LLC v. Pumpkin Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Harkins v. Girouard Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sclafani v. Dweck, No. Cv98 0167922 S (Jun. 3, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002