Legal Opinion
City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. Borsuk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1945PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This foreclosure involves the validity of and, if valid, the amount due on two mechanics’ liens. The finding, as corrected, recites the following facts material to the questions discussed on this appeal. In May, 1941, the defendant Borsuk, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, contracted with Paul Hahn for the construction of a six-room house and garage for $6900 in accordance with plans and specifications. The contract specified the times and amounts of payments. The plaintiff commenced to furnish materials on August 12, 1941, and made the last delivery on November 27, 1941. Harry…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arrrington v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Lorch v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Tramonte v. WilensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- McGuire v. ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Henry F. Raab Connecticut, Inc. v. J. W. Fisher Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- H & S TORRINGTON ASSOCIATES v. Lutz Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.