Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1930No. Docket No. 6822PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG (ELLIOT), J., pro tem.
Upon the filing of the petition for writ of prohibition an alternative writ of prohibition was issued. Respondents made return by general demurrer to the petition and the matter was submitted upon briefs, which have been filed.
On September 26, 1927, during the then pendency of an action for divorce, Edith E. Andrews and Dell Andrews entered into a property settlement which included a provision for payment of $200 per month by Dell Andrews to Edith E. Andrews. On March 1, 1928, said parties resumed full marital relations and continued thereafter to live together as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Tripp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Plummer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Schnerr v. SchnerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.