Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.
This is a proceeding in prohibition to prevent the superior court of the county of Sonoma from assuming jurisdiction and proceeding with the trial of an action' therein, entitled William Evart et al., Plaintiffs, versus Consolidated Adjustment Company of California, Defendant.
The petition is based upon the proposition that the complaint in the action shows that the cause of action set forth therein is for the recovery of money to the amount of $148.23 and no more, and that the superior court has no jurisdic tion of a cause of action to recover less than $300. The question for determination is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lehnhardt v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Simpson v. Police Court of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- California Cured Fruit Ass'n v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hamberger v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Grinbaum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.