Legal Opinion

Tripp v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1923No. Civ. No. 4089PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Petitioner's wife sued him for divorce and procured an interlocutory decree against him. Among other things the decree contained the following: “The court further finds that prior to the commencement of this action . . . the parties hereto executed a certain property settlement and agreement, which should be and is hereby incorporated in and made part of this decree, and is in words and figures as follows, to-wit”: The agreement was then set out in full. In part, it described several parcels of real property, all of which was stated to be the community property of the spouses, and by it the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milekovich v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. McCahan v. McCahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Plummer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API