Legal Opinion

Miller v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1937No. L. A. 16331PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain further prosecution of a contempt proceeding. Said proceeding is based on petitioner’s alleged violation of an order of respondent court which directed him to pay $75 monthly for the support of his former wife, Edythe Miller. It is the contention of petitioner that he is not subject to contempt proceedings for the reason that his obligation to make said monthly payments rests on a property settlement agreement, rather than on a decree for alimony.

Prior to institution of an action for divorce by Edythe Miller, the parties entered into a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API