Legal Opinion

Schnerr v. Schnerr

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1932No. Docket No. 7891PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

As the result of contempt proceedings instituted by plaintiff some four years after the entry of the final decree of divorce in the above action, the trial court made an order relating to the payment of alimony; and defendant has appealed from said order.

The divorce action was instituted in October, 1924, upon the ground of extreme cruelty. There were no - children, and no claim was made in the complaint either by allegation or prayer for alimony, temporary or permanent. With respect to property rights it was alleged “that the property rights of plaintiff and defendant have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ex Parte WeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Tripp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Plummer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API