Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Baxter

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1935No. Civ. 5111PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff filed an action for divorce against defendant on November 25, 1925, on grounds of cruelty. She alleged in her complaint “that there is community property owned by the parties hereto” and minor children, and prayed for a divorce, “custody of said minor children, and for all other and proper relief in the premises”. On the same day the defendant filed an appearance, but permitted his default to be entered.

The action came on for hearing on December 1, 1925, and on the fourteenth day of that month the court entered a memorandum decision:

“Interlocutory decree of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API