Legal Opinion

City of Lincoln v. Barringer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2002No. C036184PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff City of Lincoln (the City) initially sought to acquire by eminent domain (Code Civ. Proc., § 1230.010 et seq. 1 ) a portion (Partial Take) of property owned by defendants Donald L. Barringer and Carol S. Barringer (the Barringers). 2 While the eminent domain action was pending, the City adopted a new resolution of necessity and amended its eminent domain complaint, seeking to acquire the remainder of the Barringers’ property interests (Remainder or Remainder Parcel) as a “remnant” (§ 1240.410), in addition to the original Partial Take, such that the City…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re MisenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API