Legal Opinion
Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 1993No. B060571PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, contending that defendant violated various duties it owed plaintiffs, who had taken out a construction loan from defendant. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for attorney fees. We affirm the judgment and reverse the order.
Factual and Procedural Synopsis
I. Factual background
In February 1985, plaintiffs Suk Yong Kim and Ok Sun Kim (Kims) entered into a construction contract with Jonathan Pae to build an apartment building on property they owned in Los Angeles.
On August 6, 1985, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.