Legal Opinion

Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2009No. G038734, G039274, G039624PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

I

Introduction

In this case, we make the extraordinary, yet justified, determination that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to impose terminating sanctions against defendant for misuse of the discovery process. The record demonstrates defendant engaged in repeated and egregious violations of the discovery laws that not only impaired plaintiff’s rights, but threatened the integrity of the judicial process.

August B. Doppes sued Bentley Motors, Inc. (Bentley), for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), breach of express…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Goglin v. BMW of North America, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API