In Re Misener
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
In this case we must decide whether Penal Code section 1102.5 (hereinafter section 1102.5) is constitutional. The section permits the prosecution in a criminal case to discover from the defendant or his counsel, following testimony on direct examination of defense witnesses other than the defendant, prior statements made by those witnesses. We conclude that the statute is unconstitutional because it violates that aspect of the defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination requiring the prosecution to carry the entire burden of proving the defendant’s guilt. Section 1102.5…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. ChampionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.