Legal Opinion

State v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 2001No. C1-99-1946PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice

Appellant Jason DeWayne Schwartz appeals the district court’s denial of his peti tions for postconviction relief and' writ of habeas corpus. The district court determined that appellant failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the statutes under which the Commissioner of Corrections revoked his conditional release and re-incarcerated him were unconstitutional and concluded that appellant was lawfully detained. The court of appeals affirmed. Appellant claims that Minn.Stat. § 243.05 (2000), which gives the Commissioner of Corrections authority over supervised…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. CalmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Spann v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Dakari Michael ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API