Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, C.J.
The instant case is the consolidation of three appeals to the court of appeals challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota’s administrative child support process. This appeal presents the issue of whether the administrative process, Minn.Stat. § 518.5511 (1996), violates the separation of powers doctrine by impinging upon the original jurisdiction of the district court, by creating a tribunal which is not inferior to the district court, and by permitting child support officers to engage in the practice of law. The court of appeals ruled the administrative process…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. BairdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.