Legal Opinion

State v. Calmes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 2001No. CX-00-1273PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

On February 13, 1997, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant Thomas Calmes pleaded guilty to second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of MinmStat. § 609.343, subd. 1(d) (2000), and first-degree burglary in violation of MinmStat. § 609.582, subd. 1(c) (2000). In return, the state agreed that Calmes would receive the presumptive sentence under the *644sentencing guidelines, which the parties believed would be an executed 57-month prison term. At his sentencing hearing on March 17, 1997, Calmes was sentenced to an executed 57-month term on the burglary charge and a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Ventetoulo v. Attorney General RICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Kenneth James LundienCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. SchubertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. Van LehmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. SenskeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Vazquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API