State of Minnesota v. Dakari Michael Coles
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
Appellant Dakari Michael Coles brought a motion challenging his sentence. The district court sentenced Coles pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement in which the State agreed to dismiss several charges, and Coles agreed to receive a sentence for a lesser charge that was an upward dura-tional departure. The question presented is whether Coles may challenge his sentence in a motion to correct his sentence, see Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9 (Rule 27.03), or whether his challenge must be brought in a petition for postconviction relief, see Minn.Stat. § 590.01,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Michael Wayne v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Munt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.