Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Dakari Michael Coles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 2015No. A13-789PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Dakari Michael Coles brought a motion challenging his sentence. The district court sentenced Coles pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement in which the State agreed to dismiss several charges, and Coles agreed to receive a sentence for a lesser charge that was an upward dura-tional departure. The question presented is whether Coles may challenge his sentence in a motion to correct his sentence, see Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9 (Rule 27.03), or whether his challenge must be brought in a petition for postconviction relief, see Minn.Stat. § 590.01,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Michael Wayne v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Munt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API