Legal Opinion

Woods v. Telb

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2000No. 99-1419PublishedCited by 245 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Today we examine the validity of R.C. 2967.28, Ohio’s post-release control statute. The court of appeals held that the statute was unconstitutional in that it violated the separation of powers doctrine and the Due Process Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

I

HISTORY & OVERVIEW

In 1990, the General Assembly enacted legislation authorizing the creation of the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission and instructed it to develop and recommend to the General Assembly a comprehensive criminal sentencing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Bray v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by245 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API