Legal Opinion
State v. Humes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 1998No. C5-97-1217PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Keith Humes, challenges the district court’s jurisdiction under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9 to correct his sentence for criminal sexual conduct in the second degree to include a conditional release term. Additionally, Humes contends that the district court violated his rights under the Double Jeopardy and Due Process Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions in correcting his sentence after he had served over six'months of it. We hold that the district court’s correction of Humes’ sentence was proper under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Romano v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. SchubertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.