Legal Opinion

Spann v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 2005No. A04-278PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

On this issue of first impression, we must decide whether a defendant can waive his right to appeal after he has been convicted following a jury trial. Appellant Charles Spann was convicted of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving separate victims after a jury trial. The district court sentenced Spann to two executed 118-month sentences to be served consecutively. Each sentence was an upward departure from the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines presumptive sentence. of 86 months. Spann appealed his conviction and sentences to the court of appeals, but…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API