Legal Opinion

DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs Motorhomes

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. S-9980PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

■ “It is precisely because outright failures to respond to discovery halt the case development process dead in its tracks, and threaten the underpinnings of the discovery, system, that [Rule 37] authorizes ... courts, in responding to this kind of misconduct, ... to impose in the first instance any of a wide range of sanctions.” 1 Such power, however, does not go unchecked and is the subject of this appeal. Daniel DeNardo claims the superior court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint for failure to comply with a court order compelling…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Witt v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API