DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs Motorhomes
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
■ “It is precisely because outright failures to respond to discovery halt the case development process dead in its tracks, and threaten the underpinnings of the discovery, system, that [Rule 37] authorizes ... courts, in responding to this kind of misconduct, ... to impose in the first instance any of a wide range of sanctions.” 1 Such power, however, does not go unchecked and is the subject of this appeal. Daniel DeNardo claims the superior court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint for failure to comply with a court order compelling…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Witt v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.