Legal Opinion

Trans-World Investments v. Drobny

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1976No. 2990PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

The court is required to determine in these petitions whether, and to what extent, the physician-patient evidentiary privilege is waived by virtue of the patient filing a personal injury lawsuit.1 Because the privilege in issue has been subject to diverse interpretations not only in Alaska’s courts,2 but in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska-3 as well, we feel compelled to review the cases at this time.4

In the matter brought by petitioner Ver-vick, the parties jointly contend a vehicular accident took place on the 10th of December, 1975, between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Continental Insurance Companies v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Garner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1973
  4. Mathis v. HilderbrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Miller v. HarpsterAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API