Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1986No. S-477, S-567PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINO WITZ, Chief Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal involves the discovery sanctions imposed by the superior court in response to Penny Hazen’s failure to turn over the customer lists of her massage parlor. The superior court dismissed Hazen’s claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution and instructed the jury through an establishment order that the police had probable cause when they arrested Hazen for prostitution. We hold that the superior court abused its discretion in imposing these sanctions.

FACTS

Penny Hazen was the owner of The Body Shop, a massage parlor in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API