Legal Opinion

RODERER v. Dash

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2010No. S-13106PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Deborah Dash brought a medical malpractice claim against Dr. Grant Roderer based on a procedure he performed to relieve her back pain. A jury awarded Dash roughly $1.4 million in compensatory damages. The superior court awarded Dash costs under Alaska Civil Rule 79 and attorney's fees under Alaska Civil Rule 68. Dr. Roderer appeals from the denial of his motions to dismiss, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and for a new trial. He also appeals the order awarding fees and costs. We affirm the superior court's denial of these motions and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. del Rosario v. ClareAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  5. Okagawa v. YapleAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API