Legal Opinion

Kodiak Island Borough v. Mahoney

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2003No. S-10606PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Edward Mahoney, a Kodiak Island Borough resident who proposed a municipal term limits ballot initiative, sought declaratory relief against the municipal clerk who refused to certify the initiative. This appeal raises the questions whether a municipal clerk may refuse to certify a proposed initiative on constitutional grounds and whether that clerk may refuse to make technical corrections to a proposed initiative that is technically flawed. We conclude that a clerk should certify an initiative even if it contains a proposal that raises constitutional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Brooks v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Anchorage Citizens for Taxi Reform v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API