MacHado v. MacHado
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
This action was begun in 1913. Plaintiff had judgment for divorce on the ground of cruelty, and included in the judgment also was a settlement of property rights, to which she objected, and she appealed from the latter part of the judgment and was granted a new trial of the issues regarding property. The superior court retried those issues and again adjusted the property rights of the parties. In this latter judgment it determined that what is known as the Guth ranch was separate property of the defendant, and what is known as the Alviso ranch was partly separate and partly community…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Shay v. Chicago Clock Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Apprate v. FaureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pashgian v. StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michels v. BurkhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Williams v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Worth v. Asiatic Transpacific, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Driscoll v. VarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ross v. BeedelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930