Legal Opinion
Williams v. Nieto
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 1929No. Docket No. 3767PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property situated in Kern County. A judgment and decree of foreclosure in the usual form was entered against both defendants. From this judgment the defendants prosecute this appeal.
Said mortgage was given to secure the payment of a promissory note for the sum of $750, dated November 26, 1921.
Appellants contend there was a valid declaration of homestead on said property and that the decree of foreclosure should have been made subject to said homestead.
The record reveals two complete answers…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Doll v. GoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Downing v. Le DuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Mott v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Houk v. Williams Bros., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Perrin v. CountrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ross v. BeedelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930