Michels v. Burkhard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John W. Shenk, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action to quiet title. The complaint, is in the usual form. The answer of the defendant Emma A. Burkhard is a general denial of the material allegations of the complaint. By way of further defense she sets up an alleged declaration of homestead, made, executed, and recorded by her in the year 1912, covering the property involved in this action—which declaration contains recitations that she is actually, residing on such property with her family, a son, and that her husband has never made a declaration of homestead on said property or “executed any document claiming a homestead”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Farley v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Greenlee v. GreenleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Michelman v. FryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McGaffey v. SudowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.