Shay v. Chicago Clock Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for a trespass committed by the defendant in taking and carrying away certain personal property of the plaintiff. Service of the summons and of a . copy of the complaint was made upon the defendant •May 18, 1895, and on May 29th its default for failure to *551appear was entered by the clerk. June 5, 1895, judgment was entered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of two thousand dollars. June 7th a motion was made to set aside the default and judgment, on the ground that the same were entered and given “ through…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by17 opinions
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Soliri v. FassoMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.