Apprate v. Faure
California Supreme Court
' APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County and from an order denying a new trial. Justin Jacobs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to quiet title to a certain' tract of land. The defendant Faure in his answer claims an interest therein. Judgment went for the defendant, from which, and from an order denying the motion for a new trial, this appeal is taken. Plaintiff should recover in the action unless defeated by reason of the claims of defendant founded upon s’ homestead.
The defendant rested his case upon the introduction in evidence of a declaration of homestead duly filed for record and containing all the recitals demanded by the statute, coupled with the additional evidence found in the stipulation…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Williams v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.