Legal Opinion

Worth v. Asiatic Transpacific, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1979No. Civ. 41213PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

Asiatic Transpacific Inc., AFI Worldwide Forwarders and AFI Consolidators appeal from an order granting respondent Worth’s motion for a new trial.

The proceedings in the court below began on March 20, 1975, when McCall Oil and Chemical Corporation (McCall) filed a complaint against Tyler Consolidators, Inc., (Tyler) for breach of contract. McCall also sued respondent herein for breach of his agreement to guarantee Tyler’s performance.

Respondent then cross-claimed against appellants. After hearing appellants’ general and special demurrers and motions to strike, the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. StanfillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Day v. PapadakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Gowan v. Walkes CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API