Legal Opinion

Barker v. Barker

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1956No. Civ. 20929, 21096PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant appeals from a judgment decreeing that plaintiff is entitled to a divorce, and further decreeing that certain property is her separate property and not property of the community.

Plaintiff appeals from that part of an order made in the court below directing plaintiff to pay to defendant as attorney’s fees on this appeal the sum of $7,500.

Responsive to issues tendered by the complaint and answer, the trial court made findings of fact which, insofar as pertinent to this appeal, may be summarized as follows:

Plaintiff and defendant were married on July 23, 1944, and separated…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Radovich v. Locke-PaddonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API