Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Dawley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1976No. S.F. 23418PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

The present case involves the validity of an antenuptial contract in which the parties agreed that their earnings and other property acquired during the marriage would be held as separate property. At the time they entered the agreement, the parties anticipated the early dissolution of their marriage. Relying on In re Marriage of Higgason (1973) 10 Cal.3d 476 [110 Cal.Rptr. 897, 516 P.2d 289], which stated in dictum that an antenuptial agreement “must be made in contemplation that the marriage relation will continue until the parties are separated by death” (p. 485), the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API