In Re Marriage of Dawley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
The present case involves the validity of an antenuptial contract in which the parties agreed that their earnings and other property acquired during the marriage would be held as separate property. At the time they entered the agreement, the parties anticipated the early dissolution of their marriage. Relying on In re Marriage of Higgason (1973) 10 Cal.3d 476 [110 Cal.Rptr. 897, 516 P.2d 289], which stated in dictum that an antenuptial agreement “must be made in contemplation that the marriage relation will continue until the parties are separated by death” (p. 485), the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.