Legal Opinion

Estate of Walker

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1919No. L. A. No. 5854PublishedCited by 45 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlnet, J.

The decedent, Cornelius Walker, died intestate November 20, 1913. He left surviving him as his only heirs, then in being, his wife, Mabel E. Walker, and a daughter by a previous marriage, Mabel A. Nason. A few months before his death, that is, on July 3, 1913, he had secured an interlocutory decree of divorce from his wife on the ground of desertion. He had also made a property settlement with her whereby she released any interest in his estate, with the result that on his death his daughter was the only heir then in being who was interested in the estate.

On April 11, 1914, something under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Scanlon v. WalsheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Ashton v. HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Heydenfeldt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dazey v. DazeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Gayton v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API