Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Bonds

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2000No. S079760PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this case we consider whether appellant Susann (known as Sun) Margreth Bonds voluntarily entered into a premarital agreement with respondent Barry Lamar Bonds. We conclude that the Court of Appeal erred in determining that because Sun, unlike Barry, was not represented by independent counsel when she entered into the agreement, the voluntariness of the agreement must be subjected to strict scrutiny. Instead, we determine that the circumstance that one of the parties was not represented by independent counsel is only one of several factors that must be considered in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Galinski v. KesslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API